Wait, But I Thought…
March 2, 2010 by BillT
Filed under EFCC, Executive Director

“The Land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you are but aliens and tenants. Throughout the country that you hold as a possession, you must provide for the redemption of the land.” (Leviticus 25:23-24)
This is one of those obscure passages that we skip over without much thought. However, as I was reading this the other day, it struck me once again how deeply the assumptions of our culture influence what I think “the Bible says”! Take the above passage for instance: it is a great reminder that God mandated a system of redemption into the very fabric of Jewish existence, including redemption of land (and slaves, but we won’t go into that!). The Year of Jubilee was a practical way for God to return the land to its original stewards every 50 years (if it had been sold to alleviate debt).
Now I say “steward” intentionally, because God makes it very clear that the Jews did not own the land – He did. Their families were “aliens”, “tenants” who just had permission to use it as stewards (to support their survival). And here is my confession: I always assumed that private property was the system mandated by God (in the Bible) and “pagan” peoples like First Nations folks in Canada were the only folks who believed that no human had the right to actually claim ownership over a piece of land indefinitely. Somewhere along the line, I took John Locke’s theory of “natural rights”, (famously trumpeted by our American cousins as the inalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness) as biblically-mandated truths. In fact, Locke first declared that all peoples had a right to the “pursuit of property” (that is how closely notions of private property and happiness were linked), but “pursuit of happiness” became the motto of our cousins to the south, many of whom earnestly believe that their country was founded on so-called Christian principles, and that these are the key Christian principles. In fact, Locke and other philosophers whose ideas were used to build and justify the constitution of the United States of America were deists who would have great difficulty in signing our EFCC 10 Articles of Faith.
Now this is not to pick on the Americans (after all, beating them in hockey is quite sufficient!). We could pick apart similar claims that “Canada was originally a Christian nation, based on Christian principles”. Certainly some Christian principles were foundational in the founding of both North American nations – but many secular notions were as well. And this is my point: I have a tendency to assume that those secular notions are biblical – when in fact they may even run counter to God’s truth. Hence, my sense of ownership of my land, my stuff – and my accompanying attachment to it (and anger at losing it) create serious loyalty issues for me. God tells me in I Peter that I am an alien – not a citizen of this world and here in Leviticus He reminds me that He owns the land not us. Yet I still have some vague sense that I am justified to cling to this world (and my “private property” in particular) and that this is somehow a God-ordained right.
This all makes me wonder how many other axioms that I vehemently defend as biblically-mandated truths are really cultural values that I have absorbed by osmosis. This is why the Word is still powerful – it subversively challenges those wrong beliefs that plague my heart and mind. Perhaps the Word still has much more to undo and redo in my mind before I get to glory…
Seeing “in a glass darkly” with you,
Bill








Matt Verhoog on Thu, 1st Apr 2010 11:46 am
I would just stand up for Locke a little bit here, because his situation was so different then ours. Locke trumpeted the right to property becasue much of Europe was controlled by a feudal system, which denied the right of any property to the vast majority of peasants/serfs. while all the land was controlled by a very magnates/gentry/royalty. but the point about not holding onto our possessions is very well taken.
Matt Thiessen on Sat, 3rd Apr 2010 11:17 pm
Interesting that you pick this verse to reflect on. I have been reading through the O.T. lately and was caught up on the idea of owning an acreage, when I stumbled upon this same verse and was struck by the idea that I am a tenant. So my prayer became, “Lord if you would grant that I could have an acreage, I sure would enjoy one.” My thinking changed from having to have one, to resting in God’s provisions.
Ironically, a few weeks later, while on a “Sunday drive”, I came upon an acreage for sale and started to pursue the paperwork to “own” it.(Some guys don’t learn by just reading and thinking.) The next evening, listening to the wisdom of my wife, we backed away when we realized how much it would have owned us and taken us out of “the race”. I am thankful God is still working!
BillT on Tue, 6th Apr 2010 12:27 pm
Hi Matt and Matt!
thanks for both of your comments. Re: feudalism and John Locke…I actually like much of Locke’s stuff (although the new “Anti-Locke” on “Lost” is kind of scary, isn’t he?) and when he wrote around 1690, feudalism was long dead in England. However, your point is well taken Matt…he was responding to kings who had a bit of a penchant for “borrowing” their subjects land whenever they had a strong disagreement. And Matt…yeah, I “own” a house down here in the lower mainland, but your point about it owning me is well taken…
Bill